Voting procedure
Review · Annual 12A controlled and transparent voting procedure
How voting signals are collected, validated and used within eligible Spa Awards categories.
- 01
- Purpose
- 02
- Framework
- 03
- Evidence
- 04
- Next step
When voting applies
Selected categories or editions may include a public or invited voting component. The relevant award page states when voting is open and how that signal contributes to the final process.
One genuine vote, fairly counted
Technical and manual controls are used to identify duplicate, automated or manipulated activity. Suspicious votes may be excluded without notice to protect participants.
Voting is one signal
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, vote totals do not replace eligibility checks or expert evaluation. Final results consider the complete award framework.
Results and privacy
Individual voter details are not published. Aggregate outcomes may be referenced when results are announced.
From entry to publication
A distinct purpose at every stage.
Clear stages make the programme easier to understand before participation.
- 01
Entry
The property record establishes identity, category and the information required for review.
- 02
Eligibility
The entry is considered within the scope and context of the relevant programme.
- 03
Evaluation
Evidence is examined against the published framework and the complete guest experience.
- 04
Publication
Confirmed laureates are connected to their edition in the public record.
Operating framework
Safeguards for a credible review.
A concise reference for understanding this part of the Spa Awards programme.
- 01Eligibility
- Entries are considered in the category and context for which they qualify.
- 02Evidence
- Review is grounded in the information available for the property.
- 03Consistency
- The published framework is applied across the complete experience.
- 04Publication
- Only confirmed outcomes enter the official record.
